The Child Problem

It is a problem of initial relationship ideal formation, and advantage given to mates who behave a certain way on both sides of the gender wall.

And while the psychology students in the crowd will undoubtedly argue that these impressions are formed first by observation of our parents, or other adults close to us in prepubescence, I argue that one learns more from doing, than raw observation, and that in this case the roles expected of a mate are solidified later in life, namely around the time of what the subject would consider their first ‘real relationship’.

My chain of reasoning for these views is as follows.

· Monogamy results in sexual tension due to the encouragement of competition, and the creation of scarcity.

Monogamy ensures that sex, an act that could be as ubiquitous as applause, is artificially linked to a limiting factor that will forever make it in far greater demand than supply, that factor being the number of above average young attractive single females, thus bloating its fiscal value through scarcity.

· That competition encourages women to look young, and for men to hunt young.

Because the younger they look the more attractive they will be to prospective mates. Many reasons for this exist.

Ø A young girl is going to most closely fit the media portrayal of beauty because it is partially about physical fitness and youth is linked to physical fitness.

Ø A young girl is going to be more worth the investment required by men because she will have more years of sexual value than an older woman, in terms of child bearing, and sex appeal.

Ø A young girl is going to have less experience, and thus more open to suggestion and deception.

Ø A young attractive mate is a symbol of power and virility in our society.

Ø A young mate is going to have more energy, and given the traits above that’s a very good thing for the man.

· Women who actually are young have an advantage in mate selection compared to other women, and that this advantage is proportional to the age difference.

This is where things get interesting because obviously the trend is not total. A female zygote is not the end all be all of female value.

There are many real and artificial limits.

o The first limit is that a woman must reach a certain level of physical development before she begins to actually look like a woman anatomically.

But not socially. What it is to be a woman in my society is much more a matter of clothing choice, hair style, makeup, and behavior, than it is the presence of female sex organs. For example the physical differences between men and women are not readily apparent at a distance until well into puberty, yet it is easy to spot the girls from the boys on a grade school playground. Why? Because of how the genders act and because of how we train and dress them.

o The second real limit is that mating is linked to reproduction, and thus a mate must be at least potentially capable of producing children.

Again physically, not socially, since mating rarely leads to children in terms of ratio of act of copulation to pregnancy. Sex has become about the feeling, a drug sold to us by the big three, rather than being about children.

o A clear social limit is the age limit on sex. There are many that are not so clear.

Like any other absolute rule, it encourages loopholes. For example it is often worked around openly by dating without sex prior to the age limit and locking the mate down via monogamy so that when the subject is of age sex can be had without having to compete with other males. If this requires lying about religious, political, or economic standing, so be it. That’s the whole point, they want you to lie because in so doing you artificially inflate their numbers, and you pay to maintain their façade. Can’t very well fake being religious without paying your 10%, can’t fake being a republican without voting right wing, and you can’t very well fake being rich without at least rent money.

Thus, men who are willing to date those who are legally children, who are willing to invest time in exchange for sex/power/prestige, and who are willing to support a sexist system of arbitrary rules…

Ø Love, honor, and obey. For Religion.

Ø The family is the center of American life. For Government.

Ø Marriage is an ideal worth spending for. For Corporation.

… end up radically (and artificially) favored when it comes to potential for breeding, and thus influencing the next iteration of society, and in so doing, further cement the power base of one or more of the big three. This is the real reason why polygamy is hated.

This is also why older men preying upon the ignorance of younger women is tolerated. Older men and younger women defend this by saying that the word ignorance is a pejorative, and that I’m saying all young women are stupid.

This is not the case.

Ignorance simply means a lack of a given type of data, we are all ignorant of something, therefore it is no more a pejorative, and no less a fact, than saying you are carbon based.

In this context what i mean by ignorance, is Ignorance of alternative mates and mating styles. If a 15 year old girl dates a man until she is 20, her idea of what a relationship is will have been almost totally defined by that man (loosely used term). She will carry that baggage with her the rest of her life. The man alternatively will most likely not be affected at all. Impact can be construed as the measure of victimization. For example, who is affected more in a murder, a rape, a mugging, a carjacking, arson, theft?

The women in these relationships typically will not even realize they are being affected, for many of the same reasons children do not know they are being abused. They assume that what’s happening to them is normal because they because of isolation have no perspective. The most insidious part of this whole effort is the fact that this behavior is encouraged because of the power it grants the big three. They have conspired to make it normal, because it profits them, hence the trillion dollar advertising effort to solidify every aspect of the mate selection, and gender identification process.

To the men in these relationships of massive age difference I say, would you still love your mate if she were 200 pounds heavier and confined to a wheel chair? Of course not, this means your motivation is sexual. But look at what you are paying for that sex, and more importantly look at who you are paying. Think of all the things that you could do to get dumped in the next 24 hours, each of those things while on the surface are an affront to your mate, are in actually an affront to one or more, of the big three.

To the women I say if you’re really meant for each other then he should have nothing to fear from you exploring society more, alone, and with other men, perhaps closer to your age. Tell him that you’ve decided to be celibate and then when the time comes for marriage and children you’ll do it in vitro. Think he’d still love you?

You’re both being had. We’re all being had. Every movie, show, commercial, or magazine you have ever read is full of propaganda. The next time you’re out, look at the signs.

Maybe this time you’ll see “reproduce, conform, consume.” Like I do.

This essay dedicated to all the wonderful little girls out there who have the chance to be free, proud, strong, and independent young women. And to all the honorable and single men who have no need of these worthless social deceptions and cruelties, and who are unwilling to trade dignity for sex.